The Operator6 min readJuly 20, 2026

How Independent Pet Stores Outlived the Chewy Panic

In 2018 and 2019, trade press and retailers alike braced for e-commerce to gut the independent pet channel. Chewy's own numbers, and what surviving stores actually did, tell a more complicated story.

Photo: Henry Söderlund · CC BY 2.0

Every trade show has a panic year. For pet specialty retail, it was 2018 into 2019: an online upstart was about to go public, and the conference-hallway consensus was that independent stores would not survive contact with it.

The fear, dated

By the time Chewy priced its IPO in June 2019, the company had raised its range twice and still popped 64 percent on debut, opening at $36 a share for a market capitalization above $14 billion after pricing at $22 for roughly $8.7 billion (Yahoo Finance; Axios). For a store owner watching from a strip mall, an online retailer suddenly worth billions felt like a verdict on the whole channel.

The data backed some of the dread. Market researcher Packaged Facts pegged pet product sales at specialty stores other than PetSmart and Petco, the category that includes most true independents, at under $6 billion in 2018, and found momentum sat with regional chains rather than "mom and pop" stores (Packaged Facts / PR Newswire). But the same report showed something the panic narrative skipped: the share of pet-owning households shopping that channel had actually grown, from 12 percent in 2008 to 14 percent in 2018, a decade of slow gain arriving at the exact moment everyone assumed the opposite.

Retailers weren’t just worrying, though. At SuperZoo in August 2019, the World Pet Association laid out a counter-playbook still in use today: sell fresh and raw food that a national supply chain can’t easily replicate, get free and individualized nutritional expertise like Ben’s Barketplace provides. Creating lasting relationships built on trust, education, and a shared commitment to lifelong health. The playbook’s third leg: make in-store inventory visible online through tools like Pointy so a Google search sends a customer to the shelf, not the cart (Forbes). Editor’s note, July 22, 2026: An earlier version of this article described Ben’s Barketplace’s nutrition consultations as fee-based; the company tells us its consultations are now free.

What Chewy actually did with that valuation

The number that got lost in 2019 was the loss. Chewy closed fiscal 2019 with net sales of $4.85 billion, up 40 percent, and a net loss of $252.4 million, with adjusted EBITDA still $81 million underwater (Chewy investor relations). A company priced like a category-killer was still years from making money on any of it.

The pandemic did supercharge the top line. Fiscal 2020 net sales jumped 47 percent to $7.15 billion as active customers grew 42.7 percent to 19.2 million, and Chewy finally posted a positive adjusted EBITDA year along with its first-ever profitable quarter in Q4: $21 million in net income against a $60.9 million loss in the same quarter a year earlier (Forbes). The full-year loss was still $92.5 million, narrower, not gone.

Profitability took three more years to become a habit, and it wasn't a straight line. Fiscal 2021's loss narrowed again to $73.8 million even as active customers crested at 20.66 million (Retail Dive). Fiscal 2022 finally delivered Chewy's first full year of GAAP profit, $49.2 million on $10.1 billion in sales, the same year its active customer count actually fell, to 20.4 million, as CEO Sumit Singh cited "continued softness in discretionary spending" (Chewy investor relations; Modern Retail). By fiscal 2025, the arc had settled: $12.6 billion in net sales, 21.3 million active customers, $222.8 million in net income, and $719.2 million in adjusted EBITDA (Chewy investor relations).

Chewy needed six years and a shrinking customer base along the way to become reliably profitable. The independent channel it was supposed to erase had that whole window to adapt.

What indies did instead of competing on price

Some of the clearest evidence predates the panic but explains it. In 2017, when PetSmart bought Chewy, Champion Petfoods and Fromm Family Foods pulled their products from Chewy's shelves entirely, stating their "commitment to pet specialty retailers has been clear and non-negotiable" once Chewy stopped meeting their definition of a specialty account (Pet Age). That specialty-only posture, not price, is leverage an independent has that a marketplace does not: a brand that will simply not sell where a big-box or e-commerce parent owns the shelf.

The current version of the playbook looks a lot like Bark & Luv, a Chandler, Arizona store owner Megan Ames opened in 2024 after six months studying the neighborhood's demographics before signing a lease. The store stocks holistic and premium lines unavailable at nearby big-box locations, runs private dog-washing bays, staffs certified canine nutritionists, and puts high-margin merchandise up front with food in back (Pet Age). None of that competes with Chewy on price. All of it depends on being physically present.

The infrastructure around that strategy is newer than the panic, too. The Independent & Neighborhood Pet Retail Association (IndiePet) runs disaster-relief grants and a sustainability partnership with the Pet Sustainability Coalition, and frames its pitch to retailers plainly: customers come in for "recommendations... and to create relationships with trusted experts," the thing curation and expertise buy that a checkout algorithm can't (IndiePet).

If this is the kind of operator-level read you want every week, subscribe to PetRetailNews.

What this means for the shelf

For the store owner: Price is a fight you lose to a company with Chewy's logistics. Curation, service labor (grooming, wash bays, nutrition consults), and fresh/frozen categories that punish shipping economics are the moat, and they're the same things the 2019 SuperZoo playbook named before Chewy had ever turned a profit.
For the buyer/category manager: Fresh, frozen, and specialty-only SKUs are differentiation, not a side category. If a brand also sells on Chewy or Amazon, assume your customer can already get it cheaper there.
For the brand/DTC operator: Specialty-only distribution is a credibility asset with the independent channel, not just a legacy policy. Champion and Fromm's 2017 stance is still cited in the trade as the model for it.

How we're thinking about it

We think the 2018-2019 panic got the mechanism right and the outcome wrong. E-commerce did pull share, and it will keep pulling commodity purchases like bagged kibble refills toward whoever ships it cheapest and fastest. But the panic assumed pet retail was one undifferentiated market, and Chewy's own numbers argue otherwise: a company that opened trading at a $14 billion valuation still needed six years, and a stretch of shrinking customers along the way, to post something that looked like durable profit.

The independents still open didn't out-scale Chewy. They stopped trying to be a smaller, worse version of it and leaned into what a warehouse-and-algorithm business structurally cannot do: wash a dog, look a customer in the eye and recommend a food, or carry a brand that has chosen never to sell where Chewy does. That's not nostalgia, it's different unit economics than the one Chewy is playing, and it's why the channel that was supposed to be a rounding error by 2026 is instead still running its own trade association, its own disaster fund, and its own supplier relationships.

The Bottom Line

Chewy proved e-commerce works at pet-industry scale; it never proved independents were obsolete. It proved they needed a different playbook than "sell what Chewy sells, cheaper," and the ones who found it in 2019 are the ones still open in 2026.

Sources

Get the next issue in your inbox. Free, weekly, no fluff.

Unsubscribe anytime.

← Back to the Newsdesk