A customer stands in your supplement aisle, holding two joint support products, flipping both over, scanning the backs. One lists glucosamine, chondroitin, MSM, turmeric, and five certifications. The other has half the ingredient count and a single claim about supporting easier movement. She puts the first one back and buys the second.
Here's what just happened
Pet Age just published a deep look at what's driving supplement purchases, and the takeaway challenges the label strategy many retailers have relied on. Pet parents are more informed than ever, they research ingredients, compare labels, read reviews, seek vet guidance, but ingredient lists alone aren't closing the sale. According to James Finnigan, CEO and Founder of Bernie's Best, the clearest real-world test of a supplement's effectiveness isn't what's on the label, it's whether a dog parent notices actual changes: better stool quality, a healthier-looking coat, easier daily movement. The source points to omega-3 supplements as a case study, some products contain enough of the ingredient to make a marketing claim, but not enough to provide meaningful support for dogs. Two products may list similar ingredients on paper while delivering vastly different results in practice.
Why this is actually a big deal
The article notes that while many pet owners recognize common supplement ingredients, evaluating sourcing, dosage, and manufacturing standards is difficult. As shelves become more crowded, brands that clearly explain their formulations and support their claims with science are standing out, but not because they list more certifications. Finnigan puts it plainly: "The front of the package is marketing; the real clues are on the back of the package and in the company behind it. What you're really looking for is evidence that the formula was built with intention: meaningful ingredient amounts, a reason those ingredients were chosen, and a clear point of difference from everything else on the shelf."
The article also flags that many products are built from ready-made formulations supplied by contract manufacturers, making it even more important for brands to articulate what makes their approach different. Finnigan's read: "Science-backed products get stronger when you look closer; marketing-driven products usually start to feel thinner."
This matters because if your team is explaining ingredient dosages without converting the sale, the problem isn't your staff, it's the products you're stocking and how they're positioned on the shelf.
What this means for the shelf
For the store owner: If your supplement section requires staff intervention to move product, the fix isn't more training on ingredients, it's stocking brands that pre-answer objections in ten words or less. Look for products that lead with the outcome ("supports joint mobility in aging dogs") rather than the ingredient list. If a brand can't explain its point of difference without a lengthy explanation, it's not going to move without your team hand-selling it, and that doesn't scale.
For the buyer: When you're evaluating a new supplement line, ask the rep two questions: What makes this different from the three products already on my shelf? And what should a customer notice? If they can't answer both clearly, pass. The article notes that as shelves become more crowded, brands that clearly explain their formulations and support their claims with science are increasingly standing out. The brands that can articulate their formulation strategy are the ones worth the shelf space.
For the brand/DTC operator: If you're adding certifications to win specialty placement, you're solving the wrong problem. The article makes clear that today's pet parents expect evidence, expertise, and measurable outcomes, not marketing claims. Finnigan's advice: "The goal is to give dog parents clearer, more useful information so they can understand what's in products, why ingredients matter, and how to think about their dog's health, not just supplements." That means your pitch to independents should lead with the outcome your product delivers and the research that backs it, not the ingredient count. Retailers are looking for products that reduce decision time at the shelf, not increase it.
Science-backed products get stronger when you look closer; marketing-driven products usually start to feel thinner.
How we're thinking about it
The article points to a broader shift: innovation is moving beyond new ingredients and into better formulation. Finnigan believes the category is approaching a period of reformulation, noting that many products still rely on older ingredients or formulas that made sense years ago but don't reflect where science is now. At Bernie's Best, he says, the focus is on building products around better research, stronger ingredient combinations, and the idea that dogs deserve more good years, not just more years.
The transparency that matters isn't ingredient disclosure, it's transparency about why the formula works and what a customer should expect. That's a harder story to tell, but it's the one that actually closes the sale.
If this is the kind of operator-level read you want every week, subscribe to PetRetailNews.
The article also flags a responsibility shift: as consumer expectations rise, supplement companies face more pressure to substantiate claims, provide educational resources, and demonstrate genuine value beyond packaging and advertising. Finnigan's take: "It's less about saying we're here to change the industry and more about helping the next dog, and the next one after that. If we stay focused on making better products and helping pet parents feel more informed, I think the industry will get better as a result." That's the brand pitch that wins independent retail, not the one that leads with certifications.
What to do about it
-
If you're stocking supplements based on ingredient lists alone... walk your aisle this week and pull three products. For each one, write down the outcome a customer should notice. If you can't do it in one sentence, that product is costing you labor hours without converting. Consider replacing it with a brand that leads with the support goal, not the ingredient count.
-
If you're a buyer evaluating a new supplement line... add two questions to your rep meetings: What makes this different from the three products already on my shelf? And what should a customer notice? If the rep can't answer both clearly, the product won't move without hand-selling. Pass and ask for the next pitch.
-
If you're a brand trying to win independent placement... rewrite your one-sheet. Lead with the outcome your product delivers and the research that backs it. Put the ingredient list second. Retailers are looking for products that reduce decision time at the shelf, and the pitch that wins is the one that pre-answers the customer's question before your rep leaves the store.
-
If you run a team... train your staff to ask one question when a customer picks up a supplement: "What are you hoping to support?" Then match the answer to the outcome, not the ingredient. Joint mobility, coat health, digestive support, the customer already knows the problem. Your job is to point them to the product that solves it, and that's the one with the clearest support claim, not the longest ingredient list.
-
If you're planning your next resets... watch which supplement brands are moving without staff intervention. The article notes that as shelves become more crowded, brands that clearly explain their formulations and support their claims with science are increasingly standing out. If a product requires lengthy explanation to convert, it's not a merchandising win, it's a labor cost. Stock the brands that do the work for you.
The Bottom Line
Pet parents don't need more ingredient education, they need to know what a product will actually do for their dog, and whether the brand behind it built the formula with intention or just copied what was already on the shelf.